LAW.coLAW.co

DAVID LEVINS, RESPONDENT, v. FULTON SPECIALTY COMPANY, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1923-09-28
99 N.J.L. 280

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

■ The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief J ustice, Tkenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimer, Van Buskirk, JJ. 9. For reversal — None.