LAW.coLAW.co

EVA LEHR, RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM SATSKY, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1924-03-03
99 N.J.L. 512

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should bo affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Trenchard, Mintuen, Kalisch, Campbell, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Yan Buskirk, Clare, JJ. 10. For reversal — None.