LAW.coLAW.co

J. PAUL JAMIESON, APPELLANT, v. JOHN A. MARTIN, RESPONDENT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1924-02-01
99 N.J.L. 508

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the réasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ohiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Mint-urn, Campbell, Gardner, Aokerson, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 10. For reversal — Hone.