LAW.coLAW.co

S. L. DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. SAMUEL R. LADEN, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1924-03-03
99 N.J.L. 525

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Black in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chan cellos, Chief Justice, Trengharb, Parker, Minturn, Campbell, Heppenheimee, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 10. For reversal — FTone.