LAW.coLAW.co

MORRIS MARGOLIS AND HYMAN M. MARGOLIS, RESPONDENTS, v. MAN PINNAS AND SAM PINNAS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS PINNAS & PINNAS, APPELLANTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1924-04-11
99 N.J.L. 515

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Minturn. Kalisoh, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.