LAW.coLAW.co

Hamilton S. Battin, complainant-respondent, v. Jennie Mae Battin and Lambert Earle Battin, defendants-appellants

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1923-03-05
94 N.J. Eq. 497

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

We have examined the record in this case, with the result that we have reached the same conclusion as the learned vice-chancellor, who advised the decree in which the respective rights and interest of the parties in the premises are ascertained and adjudged. Also, the bill filed for a partition and a decree of sale of the premises should be sustained. The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed.

For affirmance—-The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Tkenchard, Parker, Bergen, Black, Katzenbach, White, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Buskirk—11.

For reversal—None.