JOSEPH W. SUTTON, APPELLANT, v. LE ROY S. CHAMPION, COLLECTOR OF TAXES, RESPONDENT

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenci-iard, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 11. For reversal — Hone.