LAW.coLAW.co

JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1925-05-18
101 N.J.L. 569

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam delivered in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.