LAW.coLAW.co

JOHN TRICOLO, RESPONDENT, v. DONATO CENTALANZA AND RAFFAELE CENTALANZA, APPELLANTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1925-05-18
101 N.J.L. 570

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

Our examination of this case has led up to the conclusion that a right result was reached in the court below upon the facts, and, therefore, the judgment under review herein should be affirmed. For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.