LAW.coLAW.co

GEORGE HAMMEL, APPELLANT, v. JESSE VAN SICKLE, RESPONDENT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1925-03-16
101 N.J.L. 402

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskiek, Clark, McGlennon, Kats, JJ. 13. For reversal — None.