PER CURIAM.
Larry James Hillian appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hillian, No. CR-96-62-3-V (W.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
To the extent Hillian attempts to appeal previous court orders in his informal brief, his appeal is untimely as to those orders. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a).