PER CURIAM.
Monica Coleman appeals from the district court’s order dismissing as interlocutory her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order granting Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examinations of certain third-parties. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Coleman v. Simpson, Nos. CA-01-644-MJG; BK-99-56381; AP-99-56239-SD (D.Md. Mar. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.