LAW.coLAW.co

CHARLES CHRISTIANSEN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. W. H. & F. W. CANE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1910-09-16
80 N.J.L. 460

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

Eo bill of exceptions has been filed with the writ of error, and although the attention of counsel was called to the defect upon the argument, the lack has not been supplied. Eo error has been made to appear to us and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Gray, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 14.

For reversal—Eone.