LAW.coLAW.co

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. OTTO KIND AND CHARLES KIND, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1910-11-14
80 N.J.L. 466

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice-Parker in the Supreme Court. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Dill, JJ. 10. For reversal—Yone.