PER CURIAM.
Elmer Bowen appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s decision that Bowen was not entitled to Disability Insurance Benefits. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bowen v. Apfel, No. CA-88-140-2 (W.D.Va. Nov. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.