Per Curiam.
There being evidence to support the findings of the Supreme .-Court as to the fact of notice and of laches on the part of the plaintiff in error, the judgment of that court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Voorhees, Kalisch, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 14.
For reversal—None. ■