LAW.coLAW.co

MARGARET UNGER, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH PANKUCH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Supreme Court1912-03-04
82 N.J.L. 750

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance—-The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 14. For reversal—None.