LAW.coLAW.co

The Millville Improvement Company, defendant and appellant, v. The Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, complainant and respondent

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1900-11-19
61 N.J. Eq. 671

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Grey, who advised it.

This affirmance is, however, without prejudice to the parties in respect to any application they may be advised to make in the court of chancery, when the cause is remitted, as to the mode of sale of the mortgaged premises directed by the decree. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chibe-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Adams, Vredenburgh—12.

For reversal—None.