Lumpkin, J.
When, on tlie trial of a claim case, there was no evidence at all showing that the property levied on either belonged to, or was in possession of, the defendant in fi. fa., the court rightly ordered the levy to be dismissed. Judgment affirmed. The levy was dismissed for want of proof, and the claim sustained. The plaintiffs excepted.
M. R. Freeman, by brief, for plaintiffs.
Steed & Wimberly, by brief, for defendants.