LAW.coLAW.co

MARY BENZ, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1912-11-18
83 N.J.L. 780

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

■ The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Voorhees, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Congdon, Wi-itte, Treaoy, JJ. 12. For reversal — -None.