THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH THOME, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Vreden-BURGI-r, CONGDON, WHITE, TREAOY, JL 11. ■ For reversal — None.