LAW.coLAW.co

Canan versus McCamy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1881-11-07No. No. 299
1 Pennyp. 397

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam :

This was an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace. The declaration was in assumpsit in the common counts, with a special count — informally drawn — upon the warranty of a horse. It is not pretended there was any express warranty, but the plaintiff relied upon a representation alleged to be false and fraudulent. For that the proper action would be case for deceit, of which the justice had no jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed.