Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered August 10, 2001, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Schoenfeld, J., without costs or disbursements. In addition, we note service was defective as it was in violation of CPLR 2103 (a), as conceded by appellant at oral argument. No opinion. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Saxe, Buckley, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
In the Matter of Michael Bloomberg, Respondent, v. Michael N. Niebauer, Appellant, et al., Respondent
286 A.D.2d 267732 N.Y.S.2d 154
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.