—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that Supreme Court erred in instructing the jury that defendant could be convicted of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [2], [3]) if he know ingly entered or “remain [ed] unlawfully” in the dwelling of the victim with the intent to commit a crime therein (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Miles, 281 AD2d 331, 332; see also, People v Salgado, 273 AD2d 860, 861, lv denied 95 NY2d 892). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Catena, J. — Burglary, 1st Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Wisner, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Troy Bullock, Appellant
286 A.D.2d 908730 N.Y.S.2d 904
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.