LAW.coLAW.co

Gerhab versus Ruth et ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1882-05-01No. No. 401
2 Pennyp. 250

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

— Per Curiam:

There was no evidence to submit to the jury as to the agency of the husband for the wife. Gerhab knew it was the wife’s money, and Ruth’s declarations were not sufficient to bind her. The assignments of error to the charge are not sustained. Judgment affirmed.