LAW.coLAW.co

J. I. Gracy & Co. vs. William Wright; Executors of Waters vs. Wilks B. Waters

Constitutional Court of South Carolina1822-11
2 McCord 27813 S.C.L. 278

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Mr. Justice Johnson

delivered the opinion of the court:

If it were necessary, the most ample reasons might he given in support of the opinion expressed iri the court below, as tending to the prompt and efficient administration of justice without prejudice to either party, and at the least possible expense. All that is necessaiy however to a rule of practice is, that it should he fixed arid known.— The concurrence of the court in the opinion expressed in the court below is therefore all that is necessaiy for the purposes of the present case. The motions are refused.

Justices Huger, Gantt, Noti and Richardson, concurred.