Per Curiam.
The questions presented for consideration by this writ of error are identical with those discussed by us in the opinion delivered at this term in the ease of McGrath v. Bayonne, ante p. 188; and for the reasons set ont in that opinion the judgment under review in the present case will be reversed. For affirmance — None.
For reversal — The Chibe Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Yoorhees, Kalisch, Yredenburgh, Congdon, White, Terhune, Heppeniieimer, JJ. 11.