LAW.coLAW.co

DANIEL LANGBERG, RESPONDENT, v. WILKINSON, GADDIS AND COMPANY, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1913-11-17
85 N.J.L. 377

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion promulgated by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Voorhees, Kalisch, Yrbdenburgh, Congdon, White, Tbrhunb, Heppenheimer, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.