PER CURIAM.
On this appeal from conviction of the crime of assault with intent to commit robbery, appellant urges, first, that there was not sufficient evidence to show the requisite intent. We think the record amply justifies the jury’s finding. Further, appellant urges that the manner in which the jury returned its verdict was improper. It does not so appear, and, quite aside from that fact, no objection was made at the trial. We find no error affecting substantial rights. Affirmed.
. § 22-501 D.C.Code.
. Appellant was represented at the trial by counsel other than counsel representing him in this court.