Decided in this case that upon a creditor’s bill the complain-antis entitled to an answer from each defendant as to the separate property of his co-defendant as well as in relation to his own property and effects, and the joint property of all the defendants.
Decree affirmed in this case, however, upon the ground that neither of the exceptions to the answer of Scott raises the objection that it does not answer as to the individual property of Saguez. Affirmance to be without costs.