LAW.coLAW.co

Montgomery v. Harson

Constitutional Court of South Carolina1805-04
1 Brev. 4803 S.C.L. 480

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Sed per curiam.

(Grimke, Waties, and Brevard, Justices.)

Costs follow the judgment; but, as the debt was satisfied before judgment, the plaintiff is not intitled to judgment for the costs alone.The receipt of the money, in full satisfaction of the debt, discharges the defendant, and operates as a release of the action; and, consequently, each party must bear his own expenses of the suit.

dissent opinion

Bay, J.

dissented. He was of opinion, that as the costs might have been claimed by the plaintiff, when he received the money in Satisfaction of the debt, and did not, probably from inattention, without any thought that he could not afterwards exact them from the defendant, before the process would be dismissed, he was, there, fore, intitled to a decree for the costs only; the debt being before ■satisfied. ■ Motion dismissed.