The court were clear, that the sutrar. under the circumstances %{ this case, could not bv taken, in the way contended for by the defendant, under the bankiupt law, as goods in transitu : and therefore gave judgment for the plaintiffs.
Present, Johnson, Trezevant, and Brevard, Justices.
Note. See Abbot, 297, and authorities cited, concerning stoppage in transitu, or on their passage, to the consignee, and before, or at their arrival at fkepiaceof destination.