By the court.
The indictment is absurd. It is impossible that the defendant could be guilty of the offence as charged. Judgment arvested.
Present, Grimke, Waties, Johnson, Trezevant, and Brevard, Justices ; Bay, J. absent.
The State v. Dandy
1 Brev. 3953 S.C.L. 395
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.