LAW.coLAW.co

Smith v. Vinings Administratrix

Constitutional Court of South Carolina1804-04
1 Brev. 3763 S.C.L. 376

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

The court were all clear, that the amendment ought to be made, for the reasons given in the case of D’Urphey v. Nelson, vide ante 233, and upon the authority of the case of Harrison’s Administrator v. Taylor’s Executor, ante, 289.

Present, Geimke, Waties, Johnson, Trezevant, and Bre¿ vard, Justices; Bay, J. absent.