LAW.coLAW.co

HATTIE KLOTZ, RESPONDENT, v. NEWARK PAVING COMPANY, APPELLANT

Supreme Court of New Jersey1914-10-16
86 N.J.L. 690

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chieb Justice, Garrison, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Terhune, "Williams, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.