CHARLES F. NORDSTROM, RESPONDENT, v. RALPH W. PAYNE ET AL., APPELLANTS

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Mjnturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, White, PIeppenheimer, JJ. 9. For reversal — Rone. ’