LAW.coLAW.co

MARY TERLECKI, RESPONDENT, v. FERDINAND A. STRAUS, APPELLANT

Supreme Court of New Jersey1914-10-16
86 N.J.L. 708

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Jnstice Swayze in the Supreme Court. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Parker, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Bogert, Vre-DBNBURGH, HePI’BNHEIMBR, WILLIAMS, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.