To dissolve an attachment.
Denied March 12, 1896, with costs.
The affidavit alleged (1) that defendants fraudulently contracted the debt, (2) that defendants had assigned and disposed of their property with intent, etc., and (3) that defendants were about to assign and dispose of their property with intent, etc. Delator insists that the opinion filed by the court on the mo? tion to dissolve is inconsistent with his refusal to dissolve the attachment.