To x’equire respondent to settle and sign a bill of exceptions.
Denied June 15, 1875.
Appellant had prepared a bill of exceptions and submitted the same for settlement. After some controversy and ox’al amendments counsel for the adverse party presented an entirely new bill as a substitute, which the court against objection signed. Held, that while the course pursued was irregular and an abuse of discretion, the bill signed presented substantially all the questions sought to be raised by appellant.