LAW.coLAW.co

Jay Alfred RAGUSA, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit1961-12-21No. Nos. 19086, 19087
297 F.2d 525

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Motions of Appellant under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 and Rule 35, F.R. Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.A., to vacate judgment or correct erroneous sentences were denied by the sentencing Court, and the appeals therefrom have been, on motion of Appellant, consolidated here for decision.

It being clear as to which sentence was to be first served, and that the other was to be served consecutively to it, the judgments appealed from are affirmed. Hiatt v. Ellis, 5 Cir. 1951, 192 F.2d 119; and Fulton v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 250 F.2d 281.