LAW.coLAW.co

ALBERT E. SAVAGE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD STOVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1915-06-14
87 N.J.L. 711

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review in this case will be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court in its opinion, except as to the observation, to the effect that in law there can he no identity as between an individual and a corporation. Upon the proposition thus generally stated we express no opinion. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chtee Justice, Garrison, Trench ard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Yredenburgit, White, Teritune, Heppenkeimer, Williams, JJ. 12.

For reversal—None.