PER CURIAM:
Jamar Anderson appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress by considering his prior conviction when making a credibility determination between the conflicting testimony of a defense witness and two police officers. We find nothing in the district court’s order that supports an inference that the inclusion of the term “convicted felon” suggests any impropriety.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.