LAW.coLAW.co

J. FREDERICK ORPEN, APPELLANT, v. JOHN WATSON ET AL., RESPONDENTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1915-11-15
88 N.J.L. 379

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in Devlin v. Wilson (ante p. 180), delivered at the present term, the judgment under review will be affirmed. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, SWAYZE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MlNTURN, KALISCH, Black, Yredenburgi-i, White, Terhune, Williams, Taylor, J J. 14. For reversal—None.