LAW.coLAW.co

BENNO SCHOPPER, APPELLANT, v. PAUL KRETSZSCHMAR AND FANNY KRETSZSCHMAR, RESPONDENTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1915-10-15
88 N.J.L. 386

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review should be affirmed, tor the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Minturn, Kahsch, Black, Vre-DENBURGH, HePPENIIEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, JJ. 12. For reversal—None.