LAW.coLAW.co

Riley v. Dow Corning Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States1993-10-04
510 U.S. 803

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

dissent opinion

Justice Stevens,

dissenting.

Because the Court consistently denies motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for wits of certiorari out of time, I would take that action without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Cf. Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928, 931 (1983) (Stevens, J., dissenting).

majority opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until October 25, 1993, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of the Court for consideration with the motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for wit of certiorari out of time.