LAW.coLAW.co

Mary Ellen Woods, Plff. in Err., v. William Russell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1885-10-05
1 Sadler 41

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam:

This contention is purely one of fact. The evidence in support of the allegation was sufficient to go to the jury, and it was well submitted. Its purpose was not to reform the writing, ■nor to contradict the language thereof, but to establish a subsequent arrangement between the parties. Judgment affirmed.