LAW.coLAW.co

L. H. De Wolf, Plff. in Err., v. A. G. McNabb et ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1885-10-26
1 Sadler 156

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam :

We have given the evidence in this case a careful examination and consideration. The main contention is that of fraud in the transaction.

This opened a wide door to the admission of evidence.

There certainly was evidence tending to show the conveyance by Smith to Hofius was made and accepted with intent to defraud McNabb; and there is also sufficient evidence to submit to the jury that He Wolf was not a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. The evidence was fairly submitted, and we see no sufficient reason for disturbing the judgment. Judgment affirmed.