LAW.coLAW.co

Edwin A. Nevin, Jr., Plff. in Err., v. August J. W. Spieckermann et ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1886-02-01
1 Sadler 400

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam :

The contention here is a very narrow one. The plaintiff in error submitted one point only to the court. It consists, however, of two parts. The court substantially affirmed the point, but added a qualification to which no just exception can be tahen. The case was one for the jury, and was submitted to it in a correct charge. Judgment affirmed.