LAW.coLAW.co

William Charles, Plff. in Err., v. Charles Bishoff

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1885-11-09
1 Sadler 260

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam:

The book was not offered in evidence as one of original entries. It was in connection with, and corroborative of, the parol evidence. It was properly received.

If the jury committed an error in returning a verdict for a sum greater than the evidence justified, the corrective power was in the court below. It was an error of fact, which we cannot correct here. There is no error in law. Judgment affirmed.