LAW.coLAW.co

Martin Eberle et al., Plffs. in Err., v. Girard Life Ins., etc. Co., Exr.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1886-02-01
1 Sadler 409

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam:

There was no error in rejecting the evidence. ‘ It does not tend to establish fraud, mistake, or trust. Its purpose is to establish a cotemporaneous parol agreement to change the effect of the written contract. All the facts alleged are insufficient for that purpose. Judgment affirmed.